<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Assumes The Risk of Material Cost Increases?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constructionlawmonitor.com/2010/03/who-assumes-the-risk-of-material-cost-increases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constructionlawmonitor.com/2010/03/who-assumes-the-risk-of-material-cost-increases/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher G. Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.constructionlawmonitor.com/2010/03/who-assumes-the-risk-of-material-cost-increases/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher G. Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawmonitor.com/?p=205#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Good analysis Scott!  Escalation clauses are a key provision in contracts these days.  A way I have found to lessen the blow to an owner is with a notice provision.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis Scott!  Escalation clauses are a key provision in contracts these days.  A way I have found to lessen the blow to an owner is with a notice provision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

