Archive for the ‘Filing Requirements’ Category

Sports and Construction – Lessons Learned

On January 17, 2012 Author By Seth Smiley

Growing up in South Louisiana, originally from Baton Rouge and now residing in New Orleans, I’ve had a really rough week being a sports fan. After LSU laid an egg in the BCS Championship game and the Saints came up seconds short in the NFL playoffs, I began to ponder, what can we learn from this? Being a construction law attorney, I wanted my clients and readers to learn form the mistakes and shortcomings of my favorite teams.

Some general themes we can take away from both losses are that the teams who are most prepared and execute the game plan the best will be the most successful. In both instances, LSU and the Saints did not execute and were not as prepared as their oppoinent. In the construciton world owners, general contractors, subcontractors and suppliers succeed when they are fully prepared for the project at hand and fully execute the company’s specific game plan for success.

IF LSU’s BCS PERFORMANCE WERE A CONTRACTOR IT WOULD NEVER GET PAID

LSU worked very hard all season to get into the big game. This paralles a budding company doing all it can to land that very promising bid for a substantial project. A contractor prepares for months and years to get that big once-in-a-lifetime project. When the big stage rolls around, the contractor needs to make sure, he/she does everything correctly so that they get paid and produce quality.

In LSU’s case this contractor would have not been successful in negotiating a quality contract that is mutually beneficial to each contracting party. They would not have filed all of the preliminary documents such as a notice of contract. This is a company that would have had numerous delays along the way, many of its own doing. During the course of the project this company would have not made any adjustments as the project went along continuing to further bury itself with no chance for success. When then end of the project rolled around, there would be no substantial competion filed, no adequate demand for payment, no lien filed or any other tool used to secure payment. This company would be last in line to get paid, and when its all said and done, the dream project would have been a disater, possibly putting this company in financial ruin. I encounter this type of company all the time and unfortunately, by time it gets to my desk, there is little or no hope of securing full and final payment.

IF THE SAINT’S PLAYOFF GAME WITH THE 49′ERS WERE A SUPPLIER IT WOULD FALL SHORT OF SUCCESS

The Saints on the otherhand had a game that played out just a bit differently. Had it not been for mistakes early on and poor late game defense, they too would have advanced and been in the NFC Championship game. This is analogous to many issues that suppliers have when trying to successfully obtain full payment at the conclusion of a job.

By the time I get a call from a supplier who is not being paid on a job, many of the typical right protection devices are no longer present due to the mistakes that suppliers have made early on. When supplies are delivered to a job, notice to the general contractor, hiring party and property owner need to be given to preserve lien rights. Also, suppliers need to make good practice of obtaining a personal guarantee from the contracting party. Further, suppliers need to set up an “open account” in the supply contract, which will statutorily preserve rights for attorney fees and costs. All of these precursor items can be set up in the begining and save a supplier lots of time, money, and stress at the end of a project.

When I finally get the call from the supplier to aid in collection efforts, we make a strong last minute charge to file a lien, send a demand letter asserting rights under open account, and file suit to protect these causes of action. Depending on the set of facts at that juncutre will determine our chances of success. In the case of the Saints, too many early mistakes and a shoddy prevent defense, led to their downfall. If this were a supplier then they would have gotten pennies on the dollar at best on this project, no matter the last minute heroic efforts.

WRAP UP

We need to look at the success and failures of others and learn from mistakes and good calls. There are lessons to be learned here. My teams will live to fight another day, but many companies do not. In these economic times an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, to steal a medical analogy. Set up your game plan to do it right from the start and you will end up with success, unlike the teams noted above.

Posted in:     Collections, Construction Contracts, Construction News, Delays, Filing Requirements, Litigation, Louisiana  /  Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,   /   3 Comments

Louisiana Suppliers – Extra Notice Needed for Lien Rights

On January 4, 2012 Author By Seth Smiley

Over the past holiday season, I was at a Christmas party discussing with a friend of mine who runs an electrical supply company here in South Louisiana, the intricacies of notice provisions before a company like his can file a lien on a private project. Others party-goers probably thought our conversation boring, but we were intrigued. This conversation got me thinking that I should report to the supply world what my friend did not understand…

Here at the Wolfe Law Group we love liens. We file them for clients and recommend them to all others out there as a tool to preserve rights if, and often when, funds dry up and you are not paid on a construction project. Part of the privileged class under the Louisiana Private Works Act (La R.S. 9:4801 et al), are suppliers.

There are two types of suppliers protected under this act. Suppliers who lease equipment to contractors (“Lessors”) and suppliers who provide the materials to be used in the project (“Suppliers”).

EQUIPMENT RENTAL (see La R.S. Art. 9:4802(G)(1))

For Lessors, these companies need to deliver a copy of the lease agreement to the property owner and contractor within ten (10) days of when the leased equipment is delivered to the site. This notice is required as in most states to put all relevant parties on notice of potential future claims. So for companies who deliver equipment to job-sites as a rental, it is PARAMOUNT that you send out this notice so that you can file a valid lien after not getting paid. Then with your properly filed lien you can go after the party you have a lease agreement with and the property owner, general contractor and as a last resort you can foreclose on the property! Very strong rights indeed.

MATERIAL SUPPLIERS (see La R.S. Art. 9:4802(G)(2-3))

Next, for supply houses, such as plumbing materials, and electrical supplies – these companies also need to send out a notice to the property owner and the general contractor after delivery of goods. The Supplier needs to send notice of non-payment to the owner at least ten (10) days before filing a lien. Notice needs to be sent by certified mail return receipt and needs to have the name, address of the Supplier, description of materials provided, description of the property and the total amount owed, plus interest and fees. Also the Supplier needs to put the hiring party, general contractor and owner on notice of the items list above within seventy-five (75) days of the last month that the materials were delivered to the project via certified mail return receipt – or no later that then lien period. Strategically it may be best to send out one notice after the goods are delivered to all the parties above with the required information, just to preserve the right to file your lien.

These notice provisions can be tedious and if not followed to the letter of the law, will result in an invalid lien. The notice practice should become a staple in the administration of the aforementioned types of companies.  My office constantly invalidates liens that were not filed correctly. We also file a number of notices and liens which are filed correctly. General contractors and owners pay lien holders typically first because of the added security.

Bottom line – all of the successful rental and supply companies have these notice mechanisms in place. If you are a company who plans on competing in this arena, then following notice laws is always a smart plan.

Other resources on the topic: Zlien.com, reasestatelawyers.com, levy-law.com,

Posted in:     Construction News, Filing Requirements, Louisiana, Mechanics Lien  /  Tags: , , , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Leasing Equipment in Louisiana? How To Protect Your Lien Claim

On July 20, 2011 Author By Wolfe Guest
You are in the business of leasing heavy equipment to contractors. You are beginning to provide more and more machinery to jobsites. You just hit your first snag with payment. What do you do?

Chances are you are stuck in rough spot and have to defer to your contract for remedy. There is likely no answer for you under the lien law – unless you filed a notice of lease agreement with the owner within the appropriate time frame.

Lessors often do not learn about the dreaded notice provision until after they have been bitten by a bad customer. Both the Private Works Act and the Public Works Act each require that the Lessor of equipment to a construction project provide advance notice to the owner of the equipment’s use and existence at the jobsite.

Luckily, satisfaction of this requirement is quite simple. Under both Acts, a Lessor of movables (equipment, vehicles, etc.) must “deliver a copy of the lease to the owner not more than ten days after the movables are first placed at the site of the immovable for use in the work.” La. R.S. 38:2242(c). If the job is private and not public, you must also provide a copy of the lease to the contractor. La. R.S. 9:4802(G)(1).

The official comment for subsection G of La. R.S. 9:4802 states that the purpose of this law is to give notice to the owner and the contractor that equipment being used by a contractor is leased and thus potentially creating liability under the Private Works Act.

Though the type of delivery is not specified, it is commonplace to use hand delivery or certified mail. If hand delivery is utilized, it is important that the courier fill out a simple affidavit specifying what was delivered, when it was delivered, who it was delivered to, and where it was delivered.

Finally, the Notice of Lease Agreement does not have to be in any specific form – simply a copy of the contract should suffice. We do prefer that you use a cover sheet to inform the owner and contractor of the purpose of the delivery, reserving your rights under either La. R.S. 9:4802 (Private Works) or La. R.S. 38:2242 (Public Works).

Think Different To Send Notices of Lease Easily

So, now you know about this notice of lease requirement…but really, does your company have the time or attention to detail required to send these notices to each and every customer every time you sign a rental agreement?  It’s likely that you either don’t have the time, or if you can make the time, that it’s a waste of time for your company.

Think different about these notices…how about outsourcing them?

A company like Zlien (which was started by Wolfe Law Group founder Scott Wolfe Jr) is in the business of sending notices like the Louisiana Notice of Lease. They have many equipment rental companies who simply send them a copy of each new rental agreement, and Zlien prepares and sends the preliminary notice for them, keeping evidence of its delivery and a copy of the notice for you to access within your account at anytime.  It’s a great alternative to trying to send all of these complex notices yourself, and can be done so it will actually save you money.

Posted in:     Filing Requirements, Louisiana, Mechanics Lien  /  Tags: , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Washington Law Protects Contractors from Dangers of Frivolous Lien Statute

On July 19, 2011 Author By Wolfe Guest

A quick word from the construction law case files:

The Court of Appeals, Division 1, out in Washington state, has refused to deem a construction lien as frivolous based upon the complexity of the construction contract at dispute. The court in SD Deacon Corp. of Washington v. Gaston Bros. Excavating, Inc., decided back in May of 2009, that the state’s “frivolous lien” statute, coded under RCW 60.04.081, requires a more in-depth analysis of factual circumstances surrounding the substance of the contract and the lien.

The court in SD Deacon further reasoned that a court can only evaluate in a frivolous lien proceeding are, by way of example, whether the lien was properly filed, signed by the proper party, properly served, and meets the statutory form requirements. Issues of substance of the lien (i.e. the contract amount, amount due or change orders) are issues which require more substantive proceedings to analyze factual circumstances.

Because the frivolous lien procedure codified in RCW 60.04.081 does not provide for such proceedings, a party seeking to extinguish a lien filing will be unsuccessful in attempting to show to the court that the lien was frivolous.

Essentially, the court’s rule is that the “lien must be so devoid of merit that the claim has no possibility of succeeding” and that “there must be findings supporting the conclusion that the lien is invalid beyond legitimate dispute.”

The Court’s ruling provides some hope for “fringe” contractors who’s claims hold some element of uncertainty, but who desperately need the security provided by a lien in order to collect payment from an uphill contractor or owner.

The frivolous lien statute was enacted to prevent fraudulent claims against contractors, by awarding successful parties attorneys fees. The ruling in the case shows that the award of fees will not be granted unless your lien fails to meet statutory form requirements.

Posted in:     Filing Requirements, Mechanics Lien, Washington  /  Tags: ,   /   Leave a comment

Washington Court of Appeals Confirms It’s Tough To Argue Around the Model Disclosure Statement Requirements

On November 15, 2010 Author By Scott Wolfe Jr

In previous posts, I’ve written about the requirement for contractors contracting with property owners to provide a Model Disclosure Statement (Requirement in RCW 18.27.114(1)).

A case decided Division III of the Court of Appeals last year addresses a challenge to this act made by a contractor, and highlights just how difficult it is for folks to argue that the Model Disclosure Statement is not required on a qualifying project.

In this case, AWR Construction v. Labor & Industries, a contractor contracted to replace the roof of an apartment building. The owner of the apartment building – while not acting as a contractor on the project – was actually a registered contractor.

The Model Disclosure Statement must be provided whenever a contractor contracts with an owner. It is not required when a contractor is contracting with other contractors, suppliers, or the like.

AWR Construction’s argument here was that the property owner was a registered contractor, and thus, the disclosure requirement did not apply.

While this at first may sound like a clear position, there’s actually a decent justification behind the argument. The Model Disclosure Statement is required for the public’s interest, to disclose certain things to the public that is not known by them…but is known by contractors (i.e. that a lien can be filed against a project by subs, even after payment to the prime).

So, if the purpose of the statute is to disclose this type of information to the public, then why require this disclosure to a registered contractor?

Ordinarily, the disclosure need not be delivered to other contractors. The Court of Appeals found this was not the case, however, when the registered contractor was acting in the role of an owner, and not a contractor – as was the case here.

The disclosure requirement has nothing to do with the parties’ actual registration (or lack thereof), but everything to do with the role of the contractor’s customer. If the client is the owner of the property, the disclosure must be sent.

Therefore:   Send Model Disclosure Statement…or Else!

Related articles
Posted in:     Filing Requirements, Washington  /  Tags: , , ,   /   Leave a comment
Next Page »