Posts Tagged ‘Avvo’

How to Collect on a NSF Check in Oregon

Two weeks ago, we posted an article on How To Collect on a NSF Check in Washington.  Today, we address the same issue under the laws of Oregon.

In the construction business, NSF checks are a fact of life.   And sometimes, the NSF checks may cause big problems because they’re written in amounts that exceed $10,000, $50,000 or $100,000.

In Oregon, like in Washington, those who draft NSF checks have a specific window of time to make payment on the check amount, or be subjected to statutory penalties and their adversaries litigation costs.

I just published a Legal Guide on Avvo that gives step by step instructions to folks on how to collect against a NSF check.   Unlike many states, like Washington and Louisiana, that requires the use of particular forms and language, the Oregon statutes are very bland in their requirements.   To charge interest, penalties and legal expenses on a party who writes a hot check in Oregon, the recieving party need only send a written notice of the NSF check.   There’s no requirements as to the form of the notice, or how the notice should be sent.

Although, of course, we have our recommendations.

In sending the notice, you should send it through some service that allows your company to track its mailing and delivery.   In writing the notice, be certain that you identify the check in question, and indicate that if the check isn’t paid within 30 days, you’ll seek interest, penalties, attorneys fees and other costs allowed by the Oregon statutes.

This article was originally posted on Wolfe Law Group’s topic-specific Northwest Construction Law Blog.

Posted in:     Collections  /  Tags: , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

How To Collect NSF Checks in Washington, Oregon and Louisiana

In today’s economy, NSF checks are becoming a fact of life for those in the construction industry.   When it comes to your company’s collections problems, however, receipt of NSF checks may not be all that bad.

That’s because nearly every state imposes stiff penalties against those who pass hot checks.   What type of penalties you ask?   If you’re forced to collect on an NSF check, you’ll likely be entitled to attorneys fees, legal costs and interest, and that’s in addition to statutory liquidated damages that can be as stiff as double the amount of the check.

In all the states where I practice (Oregon, Washington & Louisiana), there exists powerful statutes designed to deter bad checks.  If you receive a NSF check, it’s important you follow the procedures of these statutes to ensure you will qualify for the penalties.

Over the past few days, I’ve been contacted by folks about NSF check collections a bit more than usual, and so I spent some time over the weekend drafting short and understandable step-by-step guides on how to collect on a NSF check in these three states.

We published them as Legal Guides over at Avvo.com.   Take a look at them here:

How to Collect on NSF Check in Louisiana

How to Collect on NSF Check in Washington

Posted in:     Collections  /  Tags: , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Step-By-Step Guide to Filing Miller Act Claims at Avvo.com

In today’s economic climate, even contractors who typically work on private projects are testing the waters with federal and state construction works.  And unfortunately, these newcomers are finding themselves a bit lost in procedures when it comes time to get paid.

In the event a federal project (or GC on a federal project) goes sour, contractors and materials suppliers must turn to the Miller Act as a remedy.

We talk about Miller Act Claims on this blog here and there, but there are some other great resources out there on the topic.  Take a look at the Miller Act conversations on the Construction Lien Blog or the Federal Construction Contracting Blog for example.

In addition to these resources, I’ve just published a Legal Guide on Avvo.com titled “How to File A Mechanics Lien.”

It breaks down the process in four steps, easy on the eyes:

  1. Determine if you have the right to file a claim
  2. Send Miller Act Notice to the prime contractor within 90 days from last furnishing labor/materials
  3. Sent Notice to the surety (optional)
  4. File Suit Against the Bond within 1 year from last furnishing labor/materials

Take a look at it over on Avvo.com by clicking here.

Posted in:     Miller Act Claims  /  Tags: , ,   /   Leave a comment

Avvo Legal Guides on Oregon and Louisiana Liens Published

Want a step-by-step guide on how to file construction or mechanic liens in Louisiana or Oregon?   Your call has been answered this weekend with the publication of Avvo Legal Guides on both these subjects, which you can view here:

How to File a Construction Lien in Oregon

How to File a Construction Lien in Louisiana

These two legal guides offer plain english explanations on how to prepare and file a construction lien in either of these states.

The two above-listed legal guides were written and published by Scott Wolfe Jr., the founding attorney of Wolfe Law Group.  He previously published a similar legal article on Avvo.com about filing construction liens in Washington, which you can read here.

Posted in:     Filing Requirements  /  Tags: , , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

How to Challenge an Improperly Filed Construction Lien

Scott Wolfe, a construction attorney in Louisiana, Washington & Oregon, and he recently published two legal guides on the attorney rating website, Avvo.com.   The two articles discuss how to dispute a construction lien in Louisiana and Washington state.

Here are links to the articles:

The article even points readers to a free template letter demanding the cancellation of an improperly filed lien.

What makes a lien invalid?  Read about common filing mistakes over at construction lien blog.

Posted in:     Dispute A Lien  /  Tags: , , , ,   /   Leave a comment