Posts Tagged ‘Green Roof’

Think Green Building Risks Are Overstated? Check Out San Juan’s Green Roof Project

San Juan, TX set out to install a beautiful green roof on a city building, but after some engineering work was performed, the roof had to be decreased substantially in size because it would not be able to support the additional weight. The story was reported by a local publication, The Monitor.

It seems the green roof weight issue came as a surprise to the local planners, who already received a grant for the installation. It shouldn’t come as a complete surprise to readers of our blog. We proposed this exact thing as a potential problem with green roofs in an October 2010 blog post: Examples of Things That Can Go Wrong With Green Building Projects. I’ve mentioned it a number number of times in various presentations I’ve given on Green Building.

The good news is that San Juan discovered this problem before the roof’s installation, reminding us that engineering reports and review of green jobs on the front end can pay dividends in the long run. This weight problem could have easily gone the other way, with the problem discovered during or after the installation.

Posted in:     Green Building  /  Tags: , ,   /   1 Comment

Examples of Things That Can Go Wrong on a Green Building Project

Green Building is all the rage in the United States.   Whether it be a LEED project, or just a promise to the property owner to build or make a building more efficient and sustainable, as 2010 passes onto 2011, those in the construction industry are quite likely to run into projects with at least some green elements.

When bidding, contracting and working on these projects, it’s important to know what might go wrong.   After all, if you have no idea what things can go wrong, you have no way to prepare for them (or charge for the extra risk).

There’s no way to enumerate all of the risks…but here are a few to get you thinking about it:

1)  Vegetative Roofing: In some areas, these so-called “green roofs” are becoming popular.  The most ambitious green roof program is likely found in Portland, which we’ve discussed in a previous post.   Essentially, vegetation is planted on the roof of a building to better insulate it, reduce the heat island effect in the area, and better control water runoff.   The downside?   Well, it’s quite a bit heavier than a standard roof, and the construction and design of the structure should accommodate the extra weight.

2)  Rainwater Runoff:   Plan on channeling rainwater into storing containers to use within the property as waste water?   Be sure to contract with someone with experience, because the control of rainwater is different than the disposing of it through ordinary guttering systems.

3)  Greenwashing: It’s popular to be green, and there’s an absence of real regulation prohibiting businesses from advertising its products and services as “green” – which, really, is undefined.  So, when incorporating a service or product into your technology, make sure you select vendors, products, services and the like that will live up to their marketing.

4)  New, Untested Technologies:   Even the stuff that isn’t fraudulently labeled green may still present problems, as many technologies advertised as green may simply not perform as expected, since the technologies and products are new and haven’t been tested over time.  The lesson?   Keep your vendors on the hook for promises made by their products, and be cautious about relaying promises that are uncertain.

5)  Human Interference: Green buildings and green technologies are not insulated from human intervention.   Especially considering energy performance, the human factor can be great – as humans are the ones that will control energy use (such as using more than the allocated energy amounts), and generally doing things that can affect energy use (covering windows, for example) .

6)  Certification Problems: Rating and certification system (like LEED) are not easy to guarantee.  The certification decision is left to a third party, certification can be taken away, and certification can be challenged.   Don’t be too concerned – many projects work toward a certification and get it.   But know the road ahead.

Posted in:     Construction News  /  Tags: , ,   /   2 Comments

Around the Web in Construction Law – April 23, 2010

These past two weeks, there  were some interesting Chinese Drywall posts, a great deal of Green Building issues in the news and a milestone in modern social networking.

Posted in:     Around The Web  /  Tags: , , , , , , , , ,   /   Leave a comment

Portland's Progressive Eco-Roof Program

The Oregon Daily Journal of Commerce just reported about a mixed-use project in Portland (The Beacon) installing an eco-roof to circumvent height restrictions on high-rise buildings in the city.   According to the report, Portland’s Bureau of Planning and Sustainability allows builders to increase its floor area over the city maximums by 3 square feet for every square foot of eco-roof. The Beacon’s eco-roof provides it with an approximate extra 45 feet of height.

While the DJC article focuses on an eco-roof as a solution for builders wanting to build higher, it hints at the bigger picture for Oregon developers and builders:  Portland’s very progressive Eco-Roof program.

The increase in building height is just one of the many incentives Portland provides for installing an eco-roof.

What The Heck Is An Eco-Roof?

An “eco-roof” is another word for a “green roof,” which is defined by Wikipedia as a roof “that is partially or completely covered with vegetation and soil, or a growing medium, planted over a waterproofing membrane…[that] may also include additional layers such as a root barrier and drainage and irrigation systems.”  The website for Portland’s Eco-Roof Program describes it as a “living, breathing vegetated roof system.”

It’s like a garden on the roof, and it has a lot of positive features for the environment and the energy consumption of the building (i.e. stormwater control, better insulates the building to lower energy costs, etc.).   The Portland Bureau of Environmental Services published this Eco-roof Fact Sheet explaining the benefits of a Eco-Roof.

Available Incentives in Portland

Portland leads the country in providing incentives to builders and developers to incorporate eco-roofs into their projects.

As seen in the DJC article, a developer / builder can circumvent building height restrictions by installing an eco-roof.    Another incentive for builders and developers to invest in eco-roofs is that the Portland Eco-Roof Program will fund up to $5 per square foot of an eco-roof project.   With installation costs of eco-roofs ranging between $5 and $20 per square foot, this incentive can be up from 25% – 100% of the roof’s cost.

How to Apply

Those interested in the incentive cash must apply through the Portland Bureau of Environmental Services, through the Portland Grey to Green program.  Applications are accepted and reviewed twice annually, and the application process just closed for the last time in 2009 (December 1st 2009).  However, applications can be submitted against starting in April 2010, and will be reviewed in June.

Qualifications to apply include:

  • The project is within the Portland city limits.
  • The project manages stormwater.
  • The project has a designated project manager.
  • Construction will start within two years of being approved for an incentive.
  • Funding can be secured within two years.
  • The project is feasible and buildable.
  • The ecoroof must not be complete on or before December 1, 2009.
  • The project must agree with and satisfy the city’s contact agreement requirements to receive funding.

How to Learn More

You can learn more easily online, as Portland has published a number of web pages explaining this program:

Additionally, the city of Portland is sponsoring Ecoroof Portland, a conference offering folks a chance to learn about the alternative roofing process on March 12-13, 2010.

This article was originally posted on Wolfe Law Group’s topic-specific Northwest Green Building Law Blog.

Posted in:     Green Building  /  Tags: , , ,   /   2 Comments